![]() This is definitely a game where the user reviews reflect the quality far better than the critic reviews. Don't buy into the hype about the game being "open-world." Open world games aren't that great when everything you come across in the game looks bland, lifeless, and identical to 80% or more of everything else you've already come across in the game. Repetitive combat + copy-pasted rubble + no significant story = boring waste of time. Despite the terrific art-style and interesting setting, the game does a terrible job of storytelling, and what little story-content there is is spread out throughout approximately 60 hours of mind-numbingly repetitive combat and "exploration." Soon, you realize that you are fighting the same bad-guys over and over, that the houses and assorted bits of rubble and trash you see lying all over the world all look more or less the same, and the whole experience is downhill from there. Imagine GTA, but without cars, with a lot of burning buildings that you can't really interact with the vast majority of the time, very few people, and it's populated by the same 5 kinds of bad guys all across 90% of the map. The developer didn't provide any vehicles, so while "exploring," you get to have fun walking.everywhere. The world is definitely "big," but there also isn't much to do in it or interact with. ![]() The only things that break the repetition and boredom are the cities, but there aren't that many, and they are very few and far between in a HUGE wasteland. Honestly though, who cares if the world is "big"? It really is all just the same burning rubble copy-pasted all over a big map, so there isn't really a whole lot to explore because very little of it is new and you also can't interact with much of it anyway. I often hear people say they like it because the world is so big. The only Fallout 3 is bland, lengthy, tedious, and repetitive. … Expandįallout 3 is bland, lengthy, tedious, and repetitive. It can be a fun game, but only for a little while. That's not to say, it contradicts the already established Fallout lore. The game has countless bugs and the animations do *not* resemble human beings. ![]() On your journey, you meet boring, shallow and two-dimensional characters with poor voice acting who give you just as boring and shallow quests. You manage to defeat Vault security despite being a Level 1 wimp, then proceed to destroy supermutants and the Enclave with no particular hardship. On your journey, you meet boring, shallow and two-dimensional characters with poor A horrible, flawed title with bugs, a poor storyline and little roleplaying options - an undeserving attempt at one of the greatest RPGs of all time - Fallout. … ExpandĪ horrible, flawed title with bugs, a poor storyline and little roleplaying options - an undeserving attempt at one of the greatest RPGs of all time - Fallout. I'm still in shock trying to figure out why it's score is better than Fallout 2's. The game may be enjoyable for new gamers, but for the old school type of gamers this will be a huge disappointment. And in the end: it's certainly isn't the best of both world, but a bad example of adapting a series. And when I say that, I mean: 90% shooter, 10% RPG. ![]() Fallout 3 turned out to be more of a shooter, than an RPG. Please, do not misunderstand me, I love TES, but it's design is unique and suitable only for itself. In the end Fallout started to look like The Elder Scrolls after a while. Bethesda needs to understand, that not every game that it does needs to be done in the same manner. You have the right to love it, it's fair, but it seems that you either got spoiled by modern game industry or didn't know the beauty of TRUE Fallout universe. I'm just going to say sorry for the guys that love this game. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |